President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, a world leader who refuses to bow to Donald Trump
In the interview, Lula said the US president was infringing on Brazil’s sovereignty.
“At no point will Brazil negotiate as if it were a small country up against a big country,” he said.
“We know the economic power of the United States; we recognise the military power of the United States; we recognise the technological size of the United States.
“But that doesn’t make us afraid,” he added. “It makes us concerned.”
Brazilian fightback
There is perhaps no world leader defying Trump as strongly as Lula.
The president of Brazil – a leftist in his third term who is arguably this century’s most important Latin American statesman – has been hitting back at Trump in speeches across Brazil. His social media pages have suddenly become filled with references to Brazil’s sovereignty. And he has taken to wearing a hat that says: “Brazil belongs to Brazilians.”
On Tuesday, he said he was studying retaliatory tariffs against American exports if Trump carried through with his threats. And he said that if the January 6, 2021, riot on the US Capitol had happened in Brazil, Trump would be facing prosecution just like Bolsonaro.
Former president Jair Bolsonaro at Partido Liberal headquarters in Brasilia, Brazil, in January.Credit: NYT
“The democratic state of law for us is a sacred thing,” Lula said in a lofty room draped in a colourful tapestry in the modernist presidential palace, where emus roam the lawns. “Because we have already lived through dictatorships, and we don’t want any more.”
The White House did not respond to a request for comment.
Trump has gone after Brazil to come to the aid of his ally, Bolsonaro. His proposed 50 per cent tariffs would be among the highest levies he has issued against any country, and they appear to be the only ones driven by overtly political reasons and not economic ones.
Trump has said that he sees his own legal fight in the criminal trial against Bolsonaro.
Loading
Trump and Bolsonaro – two politicians with strikingly similar political styles – both lost re-election and then both denied having lost. Their subsequent efforts to undermine the vote culminated in mobs of their supporters storming their nations’ capitol buildings, in failed bids to prevent the election winners from assuming the presidency.
The stark difference is that four years later, Trump returned to power, while Bolsonaro is now facing prison.
This month, Alexandre de Moraes, the Brazilian Supreme Court justice overseeing Bolsonaro’s criminal case, ordered the former Brazilian president to wear an ankle monitor before his upcoming trial on coup charges.
De Moraes said Bolsonaro’s efforts to lobby Trump suggested he might try to flee the country. Bolsonaro could face decades in prison if convicted.
In an interview with The New York Times in January, Bolsonaro said that to avoid prosecution in Brazil, he was pinning his hopes on intervention from Trump. At the time, the wish seemed unrealistic. Then, this month, Trump intervened.
Trump with Bolsonaro at Mar-a-Lago in 2022.Credit: AP
In a July 9 letter to Lula, Trump called the criminal case against Bolsonaro “an international disgrace” and compared it to his own past charges. “It happened to me, times 10,” Trump said.
He also criticised de Moraes for his rulings on social media content. And he said Brazil was an unfair trading partner, claiming incorrectly that the US had a trade deficit with Brazil. The US had a $US7.4 billion ($11.4 billion) trade surplus with Brazil last year on about $US92 billion in trade.
Lula, 79, said it was “disgraceful” that Trump had issued his threats on his social media site, Truth Social. “President Trump’s behaviour strayed from all standards of negotiations and diplomacy,” Lula said.
“When you have a commercial disagreement, a political disagreement, you pick up the phone; you schedule a meeting; you talk, and you try to solve the problem. What you don’t do is tax and give an ultimatum.”
‘Win-win to lose-lose’
He said Trump’s efforts to help Bolsonaro were going to be paid for by Americans who would face higher prices for coffee, beef, orange juice and other products that were significantly sourced from Brazil.
“Neither the American people nor the Brazilian people deserve this,” Lula said. “Because we are going to move from a 201-year-old diplomatic relationship of win-win to a political relationship of lose-lose.”
Trump said the tariffs were also meant to target Brazil’s Supreme Court for what he says are “censorship orders” against US tech companies.
Loading
De Moraes has ordered tech companies to take down thousands of accounts and posts that he says threaten democracy. Yet, he has largely kept his orders under seal and declined to explain why certain accounts are dangerous. He has also jailed several people for posting threats against Brazil’s institutions online.
On Wednesday, the US Treasury Department announced that it had imposed sanctions against de Moraes under the Global Magnitsky Act, a severe escalation in the feud. The act is designed to punish foreigners accused of serious human-rights violations or corruption, and it places significant financial restrictions on individuals.
“De Moraes is responsible for an oppressive campaign of censorship, arbitrary detentions that violate human rights and politicised prosecutions — including against former president Jair Bolsonaro,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a news release.
Brazil’s Supreme Court did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Eduardo Bolsonaro, the son of the former president, has been in Washington lobbying for such sanctions for months.
Loading
The State Department had already revoked the visas of de Moraes, other Brazilian Supreme Court justices and their families for “censorship” and a “political witch hunt against Jair Bolsonaro”.
When asked about the potential sanctions on Tuesday, a day before they were announced, Lula said: “If what you’re telling me is true, it’s more serious than I imagined. The Supreme Court of a country has to be respected not only by its own country, but it has to be respected by the world.”
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Get a note direct from our foreign correspondents on what’s making headlines around the world. Sign up for the weekly What in the World newsletter here.