On Friday, the delegations agreed to write up and share with each other the conditions that would make a ceasefire possible, Turkey’s Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan, whose government convened the talks, wrote on the social platform X.
The Ukrainians and Russians also agreed to meet again, in principle, Fidan said.
“We agreed that each side would present its vision of a possible future ceasefire and would spell it out in detail,” the Kremlin aide leading the Russian delegation, Vladimir Medinsky, said in a news briefing after the talks.
“After such a vision is presented, we believe it would be appropriate to also agree to continue our talks on this.”
But in comments on Russian state television, Medinsky also said that those who say a ceasefire must come before peace talks had no knowledge of history. He said, as Napoleon Bonaparte proved, “war and negotiations, as a rule, always happen simultaneously”.
Putin aide Vladimir Medinsky (second left) is leading the Russian delegation.Credit: AP
Medinsky, in the news briefing, said his team had noted Ukraine’s request for direct negotiations between Putin and Ukraine’s President, Volodymyr Zelensky. He did not commit to arranging such a meeting.
Loading
Zelensky, during a trip to a summit in Albania on Friday, said Putin was “afraid” to meet him in person and had turned the Istanbul talks into a “staged, empty process”.
The Ukrainian leader demanded new sanctions against Russia’s energy sector and banks until Moscow engaged in what he called serious diplomacy.
“Pressure must continue to rise until real progress is made,” Zelensky said.
President Emmanuel Macron of France echoed the sentiment, calling on Friday for “increased pressure from the Europeans and Americans” on Russia to obtain a ceasefire.
Loading
Zelensky and Macron, alongside leaders of Britain, Germany and Poland, spoke by phone with Trump about the matter on Friday, said Serhiy Nikiforov, the Ukrainian president’s press secretary, who did not release additional details.
No breakthroughs
From the start, the Istanbul negotiations were not expected to yield huge breakthroughs. But the meeting was a tactical win for Putin, who began the talks without first agreeing to a battlefield ceasefire that Ukraine and almost all of its Western backers had sought as a precondition for negotiations.
Loading
Despite encouraging the talks earlier in the week, Trump undercut them in comments on Thursday, saying nothing meaningful would happen until he met with Putin. On Friday, Trump said he might call the Russian leader and would meet him “as soon as we can set it up”.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio reiterated that sentiment, calling it “abundantly clear” that a breakthrough wouldn’t occur until a meeting between the US and Russian leaders took place.
“I don’t think anything productive is actually going to happen from this point forward until they engage in a very frank and direct conversation, which I know President Trump is willing to do,” Rubio said on Thursday.
On Friday, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said Moscow agreed that a meeting between the Russian and US leaders was necessary. But he noted that such a summit would require careful preparation to yield results.
Despite those sentiments, Rubio travelled to the Istanbul palace where the talks took place early on Friday. US officials met with the Ukrainians and Russians separately but left it to Turkey to convene direct talks in the afternoon. Rubio left the palace to meet national security advisers from Britain, France and Germany and did not stay for the talks.
Pope Leo XIV extended an offer to host subsequent talks between Ukraine and Russia at the Vatican. The Holy See’s Secretary of State, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, said on Friday that the Pope’s offer “is the availability of a space”. He called the Vatican an “appropriate place” for peace talks.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Get a note directly from our foreign correspondents on what’s making headlines around the world. Sign up for our weekly What in the World newsletter.
