Base, Coinbase’s Ethereum Layer-2 blockchain, experienced a 33-minute outage on Tuesday after a faulty system switch disrupted block production. The issue arose at 6:07 a.m. UTC when the network’s main sequencer—responsible for ordering transactions—began to lag.
To prevent downtime, the network relies on a management tool called Conductor, designed to automatically reroute operations to a backup sequencer. However, in this instance, the conductor mistakenly redirected the load to a mainnet sequencer still under development and not equipped to handle live transactions. This misconfiguration triggered a full stop in block production across the network.
According to Base Build, the project’s official communications channel on X, engineers quickly responded to the incident and restored full functionality by 6:40 a.m. UTC. The team confirmed that no chain reorganization was needed, which helped preserve the blockchain’s stability.
Despite the brief duration, the incident spotlighted critical vulnerabilities in Base’s infrastructure, raising concerns about reliability in one of Ethereum’s fastest-growing Layer-2 ecosystems.
Centralized sequencer architecture raises red flags
The recent outage has reignited scrutiny over Base’s underlying architecture and its centralized design. Like many Layer-2 rollups, the network relies on sequencers to order transactions before batching them for final settlement on Ethereum. While multiple sequencers exist, only one operates at any given time—selected exclusively by the Conductor, the network’s centralized decision-maker.
Tuesday’s disruption exposed the risk of this setup: if the Conductor assigns the role to an unprepared sequencer, the entire network can grind to a halt. The incident highlighted the vulnerability of having a single point of failure in a system designed for scale.
Critics have raised concerns that centralization weakens blockchain reliability and resilience, especially when servicing high transaction volumes. As of this week, Base secures over $4.1 billion in total value locked (TVL), according to DeFiLlama, underscoring the magnitude of risk when outages occur.
To mitigate future issues, Base Build stated it is updating its infrastructure. In the future, all sequencers in the system will be configured and ready to take over block-building duties immediately, ensuring that failover mechanisms won’t lead to system halts.
This marks the second major outage for Base since its public launch. The first occurred on September 5, 2023, just weeks after going live. That incident also involved a block production failure and lasted 43 minutes.
Base acknowledges error, developers show support
Base’s engineering leadership was quick to take responsibility for the disruption. In a statement on X, the network’s head of engineering — who goes by “aflock” — said the team takes “chain uptime very seriously.”
“You can’t power a global economy without a solid backbone of a network,” aflock wrote. “Proud of the team for the quick response here and glad we’ve found several ways to harden our systems going forward.”
While outages often trigger backlash in crypto communities, this one received an unusual reaction from some developers and industry leaders — many viewed it as a sign of Base’s growing relevance.
Former Coinbase engineer and Save Finance founder 0xrooter said that people typically only complain about downtime on blockchains with real users, describing the incident as “bullish downtime.”
Similarly, Mert Mumtaz, CEO of Helius Labs, likened the event to issues faced by Solana, another high-throughput blockchain with repeated network outages. Despite this, Solana remains widely used, especially among retail users and developers.
Recently, DeFiLlama data shows Solana and Base as two of the most active blockchains by users in the ecosystem. Solana is way ahead with 2.83 million active addresses, while base inches past the competition at 1.09 million. These numbers indicate that, despite the regular service outages, both chains are still heavily used.
Solana stands second for DeFi TVL at around $9.6 billion, while Base is in sixth place. These numbers show that despite the performance issues both chains experienced, there has been no significant decrease in user interest on either side.
Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.
